Thanks, Sam, for responding to my post. Sorry for the somewhat long delay. In terms of having a healthy body image, I prefer body neutrality than body positivity. Body neutrality is exactly as it sounds; I accept things about my body that I do not like but cannot change due to time, physical limitations, and monetary cost, without going overboard and engaging in some of the things I find controversial in the body positivity movement. Not trying to shame other people's health journeys, but I have actually seen four to six therapists in the past ten years (from 2014 to 2024, the time of this comment) and I have learned some helpful strategies. One therapist (Dr. Goldblatt) taught me a strategy called “countering” where one tries to dismiss any irrational and distorted ideas and thoughts in their mind. He also gave me a card that says “I dare you to love yourself”, and that I should accept what I cannot change without allowing it to make me feel less about myself. Easier said than done, but it is certainly helpful advice.
I still struggle with being shirtless at a public beach due to my excess skin, belly fat, and stretchmarks. I met some women in college who dismissed me and looked the other way once they saw that I was “out of shape” and ridden with silvery stretchmarks. Also, I felt absolutely hurt by being rejected by women due to the consequences of past weight gain from the past that I cannot undo. I understand that this is getting into another controversial issue, and that is whether it is discriminatory to not want to date or find attractive members of a certain group because of their race, sexual orientation (being bisexual/pansexual), age (i.e, a young man in his 20s not wanting to date any woman 35 and older regardless of their physical attractiveness), disability, gender identity, weight, or any other form of protected characteristic.
This is very sensitive because there are some who argue that these alleged 'preferences' are somehow not innate and often the result of implicit biases (i.e., prejudices or preconceived notions that an individual is not even aware of having) influenced by prejudicial societal attitudes instilled to people through subliminal messages in media, culture, education, law, and family. Then there are those who counterargue that regardless of whether 'dating preferences' are implicit biases influenced by societal/cultural messages, consenting people should have the freedom to decide for themselves what they should value and who they want to associate with, even if those 'preferences' can be viewed as hurtful and discriminatory by some. These people also argue that even if the existence of 'implicit bias' is falsifiable and verifiable through scientific studies, it would be unfair to shame or hold someone in contempt of malice, just because they may have a prejudice they are not even aware of.
I mean, as a Black man on the autism spectrum, while I would be hurt to hear attractive women saying they would never date a man if he is Black and or has a disability nor find my attractive, someone can make two counterarguments to this. One, consenting people should never be coerced, guilt-tripped, or judged into dating anyone, even if the intent is to promote diversity and inclusion in dating. Second, I could argue myself as a member of two marginalized groups, that if a woman doesn't want to date me for my race or my disability, then I honestly would not bother with her given that she is not worth my time.
There was actually this YouTuber named Riley J. Dennis, an intersectional feminist who made political commentary videos from 2016 to 2018. One of her most controversial videos was titled “Your Dating Preferences Are Discriminatory” (
https://archive.org/details/videoplayback_20170611) where she argues...
- We all have implicit biases (preconceived notions that we are not even aware of holding) that can instilled by societal norms that be hurtful to marginalized groups.
- She claims that she is "surprised" on how many people would say that they wouldn't date a Black person, a fat person, a person with a disability, a transgender person, or a bisexual person.
- She then states along the lines of "well if you say that would never want to date a transgender person, then sorry but, that's pretty discriminatory".
- She then states that one can find a transgender person as sexually/romantically attractive, regardless if they "pass" or if they had "gender-affirming bottom surgery".
- She then argues that arguing that if someone would only find a transgender person attractive only if they pass is a “poor argument” because if "clockable sex characteristics" would turn someone off, Riley argues that it's not because of how the viewer's brain is wired or some other innate trait, but because of what Riley calls "societal norms of attractiveness and beauty that many transgender people struggle with, that are conditioned into a person's mind".
- Riley then says that if someone is a cisgender heterosexual man or a cisgender lesbian, and they are not interested in dating a trans woman because of the possibility of being intimate with a person with genitals the someone is not attracted to, that that lack of attraction or repulsion to penises for straight men and lesbian women are not innate, but conditioned by society".
- Riley argues that not finding a person with a disability attractive because of their disability is not "hard-wired by evolutionary process" but "instilled by hurtful ableist ideas of people with disabilities that somehow make them 'unworthy' or 'burdensome' to be a romantic partner".
Now, these are most of the arguments Riley claimed in that video I provided a link to, but the part about “genital preferences” really concerns me on behalf of my friends and acquaintances who happen to be cisgender lesbians. Many lesbians online repeatedly stated something along the lines of "not being into penis”, that they are not transphobic for being attracted to vagina instead of penises, and that it is allegedly homophobic to call “genital preferences” as a result of societal conditioning because it implies that sexuality is allegedly a "choice".
I know that video touches on a heated topic about dating preferences and many people across the Internet made response videos and rebuttal blog posts, dissertations, and rebuttal speeches for blogs, podcasts, research papers, and forum posts accusing Riley J. Dennis of trying to “coerce cisgender lesbians and cis-het men into liking penis out of the fear of being labeled a bigot”. Riley sadly got a lot of harassment from people who watched the response/reaction videos to her original video, and this came to the point of becoming a hot button topic when it comes to dating. It seems like
everything these days is being politicized and proselytized, even seemingly tame topics like dating and parenting. Not trying to start drama, but it exists, but I digress. Let's get back to the dating preferences issue. While I personally understand where Riley is coming from, I honestly think her original video was not well-thought-out, mainly because she talks about how “discriminatory dating preferences” are harmful to society and marginalized groups, but says near the end of the video that she “doesn't have a how-to guide on unlearning unconscious prejudices” even though she took the initiative to bring this topic up to discussion in a YouTube video.
In my view, giving Riley the benefit of the doubt, if her intent is to help people become “less closed-minded when it comes to dating”, she should have provided or at least referenced a source on how to “unlearn” or “deprogram” questionable “dating preferences” and other “implicit biases”. I don't hate Riley, but I honestly think she should have been more careful when discussing this topic.
Anywho, back to me. As I stated previously, "if a woman doesn't want to date me due to my race or my disability, then she is not worth my time, and I should seek out women who don't have those kinds of 'preferences'”. Again, I want to reiterate that I am not advocating for pressuring, judging, or coercing anyone into dating anyone, but I do concede that this topic is a complex and sensitive matter.