Page 1 of 1

Manual Sex vs

Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 7:55 pm
by lilconfused
Hello!

What creates the risk difference between manual sex and "rubbing the vulva with hands that have recently touched semen"? One is no risk, and the other is low risk, but it seems like the latter could easily happen in the course of the former.

Re: Manual Sex vs

Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 10:44 am
by Eddie C
The answer is going to be the same answer from this question: http://www.scarleteen.com/bb/viewtopic. ... 6095#p6095

If and when someone has fresh ejaculate and immediately rubs it to the vulva, without making any other stop, there might be a risk.

Manual sex doesn't have to include fresh ejaculate, you know? Can you clarify what makes you confused about it?

Re: Manual Sex vs

Posted: Sun May 10, 2015 8:18 pm
by lilconfused
Edith_* wrote:The answer is going to be the same answer from this question: http://www.scarleteen.com/bb/viewtopic. ... 6095#p6095

If and when someone has fresh ejaculate and immediately rubs it to the vulva, without making any other stop, there might be a risk.

Manual sex doesn't have to include fresh ejaculate, you know? Can you clarify what makes you confused about it?
the "immediately on vulva, etc." sounds like it could happen in the course of manual sex fairly easily, completely unintentionally. Somebody isn't really thinking, whatever. That's the only part that confused me; manual sex being "no risk" even though to me, it seems like it could be somewhat risky in a not too uncommon scenario.

Re: Manual Sex vs

Posted: Mon May 11, 2015 5:27 am
by Ashleah
Do you feel clear on what Edith said ? That manual sex does not have to include ejaculate?

Re: Manual Sex vs

Posted: Mon May 11, 2015 7:53 am
by lilconfused
ashleah wrote:Do you feel clear on what Edith said ? That manual sex does not have to include ejaculate?
Yeah, I do. Thanks.