What If Porn....
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2015 4:46 pm
...can't be held to the level of responsibility for sexism playing out in sex and relationship dynamics as many people hold it to?
This study came out this week -- http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style ... 98204.html -- that had findings that really stand counter, I'd say, to a lot of assumptions made about porn, sexism and misogyny. While I've personally never felt comfortable, from a fact-based perspective, with how much is put on porn around those two things, there certainly have been some areas I've had concerns with this around when it comes to porn, and a level of this it's-porns-fault I could understand, consider or put out there.
But, of course, study or no study, porn is made by people, and it's people who put sexist and misogynist stuff in it when they're in it. And porn is viewed by people, many of which, like most people, are going to have internalized misogyny and sexism. And how someone looks at any kind of media, and what they take away from it, always varies, whether we're talking porn or an ad for McDonald's. (As a vegan, I'm pretty sure my reaction to McDonald's ads is way different than someone carnivorous who digs fast food and doesn't have ethical conflicts with it, for example).
But what now? To me, a lot of this was a bit convenient: after all, how great would it be if fixing sexism and misogyny in sexual contexts was so easy as changing a kind of media or limiting it? That would be way easier than what it more likely involves (solutions which also likely don't impede on freedom of speech and expression).
What do you think? If you've put a lot of this on porn, and it isn't porn at the level you thought, what now?
This study came out this week -- http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style ... 98204.html -- that had findings that really stand counter, I'd say, to a lot of assumptions made about porn, sexism and misogyny. While I've personally never felt comfortable, from a fact-based perspective, with how much is put on porn around those two things, there certainly have been some areas I've had concerns with this around when it comes to porn, and a level of this it's-porns-fault I could understand, consider or put out there.
But, of course, study or no study, porn is made by people, and it's people who put sexist and misogynist stuff in it when they're in it. And porn is viewed by people, many of which, like most people, are going to have internalized misogyny and sexism. And how someone looks at any kind of media, and what they take away from it, always varies, whether we're talking porn or an ad for McDonald's. (As a vegan, I'm pretty sure my reaction to McDonald's ads is way different than someone carnivorous who digs fast food and doesn't have ethical conflicts with it, for example).
But what now? To me, a lot of this was a bit convenient: after all, how great would it be if fixing sexism and misogyny in sexual contexts was so easy as changing a kind of media or limiting it? That would be way easier than what it more likely involves (solutions which also likely don't impede on freedom of speech and expression).
What do you think? If you've put a lot of this on porn, and it isn't porn at the level you thought, what now?