Scarleteen is closed for the next two days, so that's Thursday, October 31st (for Halloween) and Friday, November 1st (for Diwali). We'll be back and able to answer your questions on Saturday. Catch you soon!

Can we play with language about sex?

Questions and discussion about your sexual lives, choices, activities, ideas and experiences.
Heather
scarleteen founder & director
Posts: 9687
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2014 11:43 am
Age: 54
Awesomeness Quotient: I have been a sex educator for over 25 years!
Primary language: english
Pronouns: they/them
Sexual identity: queery-queer-queer
Location: Chicago

Can we play with language about sex?

Unread post by Heather »

For years and years, pretty much every day, given what I do for my living, I have wished we could all break out of the common frameworks of sex as something where one person is doing and the other person being done-to; where one person is "giving" and the other "receiving." The way people talk about intercourse as "penetration" is another example of this kind of framework, that whole business again suggests someone is active, the other passive.

I think we are so, in long need of, instead, frameworks, and language that reflects them, that make clear when people are engaged in sexual activity together EVERYONE is doing. Everyone is both giving and receiving, all at the same time, if they are touching each other, or otherwise intentionally sharing expressions of sexuality together. No one is being done-to while someone else is the doer if both people truly are taking part in sex of any kind together, both really present, and no one person active while the other is passive, like a toy or doll.

One of my very favorite things about young people as a population is that I have always felt like y'all have a creativity and flexibility of language that, later in life, a lot of people don't seem to keep as much of.

I've heard a lot of ideas about alternate language like this from colleagues of mine who are my age or older, but much less than I'd like to from younger people, who I find just are more gifted in this department.

So, what do you think? :)
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead
Redskies
previous staff/volunteer
Posts: 1281
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:33 am
Primary language: English
Pronouns: they/them or she/her
Sexual identity: bisexual/queer/pansexual
Location: Europe

Re: Can we play with language about sex?

Unread post by Redskies »

I would really love to hear ideas too! I feel mostly ok about how I describe intercourse, but oral/manual sex is a completely different story. I regularly feel completely stuck for a concise and not odd-sounding way to communicate which way around - eg, which person's mouth and which person's genitals - without it sounding like either the genitals-person is passive or the mouth-person doesn't have as sexual or as enjoyable an experience. Case in point: "genitals-person" and "mouth-person"... yeah :p
The kyriarchy usually assumes that I am the kind of woman of whom it would approve. I have a peculiar kind of fun showing it just how much I am not.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post