Contradictory info on the site?
Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 3:40 pm
Hello, Scarleteen!
I'ven an user of the site since a january, I love the site. I had a "pregnancy scare" in january and you guys helped me a lot with all the info in the site.
This time, my friend is scared because she says her boyfriend fingered with a good amount of pre ejaculate on his hands, I was telling her that I wasnt posible, and I send her the link of the post called "You're not pregnant, Why do you think you are?" she calmed down for a while, I told her that Scarleteen is a really good site, etc
Few minutes later, she sends me this link, http://www.scarleteen.com/cgi-bin/forum ... 000271;p=0 .
I've read soo many posts of you guys with the explanation that manual sex does not present any pregnancy risk, and that post, it says having pre ejaculate on hands is a risk...
So it would be great if you guys clarify this for us: Manual sex with fluids on hands poses a very LOW pregnancy risk? or NO risk at all? Why there is contradictory info?
I'ven an user of the site since a january, I love the site. I had a "pregnancy scare" in january and you guys helped me a lot with all the info in the site.
This time, my friend is scared because she says her boyfriend fingered with a good amount of pre ejaculate on his hands, I was telling her that I wasnt posible, and I send her the link of the post called "You're not pregnant, Why do you think you are?" she calmed down for a while, I told her that Scarleteen is a really good site, etc
Few minutes later, she sends me this link, http://www.scarleteen.com/cgi-bin/forum ... 000271;p=0 .
I've read soo many posts of you guys with the explanation that manual sex does not present any pregnancy risk, and that post, it says having pre ejaculate on hands is a risk...
So it would be great if you guys clarify this for us: Manual sex with fluids on hands poses a very LOW pregnancy risk? or NO risk at all? Why there is contradictory info?