Scarleteen is closed for the next two days, so that's Thursday, October 31st (for Halloween) and Friday, November 1st (for Diwali). We'll be back and able to answer your questions on Saturday. Catch you soon!

paraphilias removed from DSM. thoughts?

Questions and discussion about sex and sexuality in political or community beliefs, principles, actions, policies, experiences, messages and media.
bikinksterboy
not a newbie
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 6:32 pm
Age: 23
Awesomeness Quotient: my willingness to try essentially anything
Primary language: English
Pronouns: he/him
Sexual identity: bisexual
Location: New York, New York

paraphilias removed from DSM. thoughts?

Unread post by bikinksterboy »

exactly what it says in the title. anyone can contribute to this topic (unless I put it in the wrong section)
bikinksterboy
not a newbie
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 6:32 pm
Age: 23
Awesomeness Quotient: my willingness to try essentially anything
Primary language: English
Pronouns: he/him
Sexual identity: bisexual
Location: New York, New York

Re: paraphilias removed from DSM. thoughts?

Unread post by bikinksterboy »

ok forget that this may be based on false information
Mo
previous staff/volunteer
Posts: 2287
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2014 2:57 pm
Awesomeness Quotient: I'm always wearing seriously fancy nail polish.
Primary language: English
Pronouns: he/him, they/them
Sexual identity: queer/bisexual

Re: paraphilias removed from DSM. thoughts?

Unread post by Mo »

The only thing I know about a change in how the DSM treats paraphilia is that in the DSM-5, the most recent edition, there was more of a distinction made between paraphilia and a paraphilic disorder, where the latter specifically causes someone personal distress/impairment or poses a risk to others.
I think any time you're describing what is a "normal" or "typical" sexual interest vs. an "abnormal" or "atypical" one it's going to be tough to make that call; there are a lot of cultural and contextual variables that can make something acceptable in one setting and unacceptable in another. There's at least some nuance written into the guidelines. Is it enough nuance? I'm not sure! But I'd be very surprised to see that section removed from the DSM altogether.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post