Sex ed
-
- not a newbie
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:56 am
- Age: 25
- Awesomeness Quotient: Black belt
- Primary language: English
- Pronouns: He/him
- Location: Nairobi Kenya
Sex ed
I had a question
Why is it that mutual masturbation does not have any risk of pregnancy even though there might be viable sperm on the hand of the person fingering the girl as many sites say there is a chance of the girl getting pregnant if there is precum on the finger
How even here it says that there is no risk even with precum can someone please help me out
Why is it that mutual masturbation does not have any risk of pregnancy even though there might be viable sperm on the hand of the person fingering the girl as many sites say there is a chance of the girl getting pregnant if there is precum on the finger
How even here it says that there is no risk even with precum can someone please help me out
-
- scarleteen staff/volunteer
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:33 am
- Age: 35
- Primary language: English
- Pronouns: They
- Location: Leeds UK
Re: Sex ed
Hi Jambo,
We go by the scientific information available to us. Infertilisation requires a bunch of healthy, fresh, wet and as you say 'viable' sperm. Pre-ejaculate is not that.
Someone's hands would have to be literally soaked in fresh sperm for a pregnancy to happen... not an invisible transference of microscopic portions precum from multiple surfaces
I can't comment on why other websites might be giving the wrong information. My guess is that they are under-pressure to dissuade people from sex by making any form of sex sound scary. That isn't our approach, and nor is spreadng bad information!
We go by the scientific information available to us. Infertilisation requires a bunch of healthy, fresh, wet and as you say 'viable' sperm. Pre-ejaculate is not that.
Someone's hands would have to be literally soaked in fresh sperm for a pregnancy to happen... not an invisible transference of microscopic portions precum from multiple surfaces
I can't comment on why other websites might be giving the wrong information. My guess is that they are under-pressure to dissuade people from sex by making any form of sex sound scary. That isn't our approach, and nor is spreadng bad information!
"In between two tall mountains there's a place they call lonesome.
Don't see why they call it lonesome.
I'm never lonesome when I go there." Connie Converse - Talkin' Like You
Don't see why they call it lonesome.
I'm never lonesome when I go there." Connie Converse - Talkin' Like You
-
- not a newbie
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:56 am
- Age: 25
- Awesomeness Quotient: Black belt
- Primary language: English
- Pronouns: He/him
- Location: Nairobi Kenya
Re: Sex ed
So fingering someone with a tiny amount of precum does not pose a risk
-
- previous staff/volunteer
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:06 am
- Age: 33
- Awesomeness Quotient: I raise carnivorous plants
- Primary language: english
- Pronouns: she/her
- Sexual identity: queer
- Location: Coast
Re: Sex ed
Hi Jambo,
It looks like we've already given you an answer to this elsewhere (plus, we answer it many times on our main site), so I'm going to ask that you do not ask us this particular question again. If you have other questions about sex, bodies, or relationships, we're more than happy to answer those.
It looks like we've already given you an answer to this elsewhere (plus, we answer it many times on our main site), so I'm going to ask that you do not ask us this particular question again. If you have other questions about sex, bodies, or relationships, we're more than happy to answer those.
And you to whom adversity has dealt the final blow/with smiling bastards lying to you everywhere you go/turn to and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain/and like the Mary Ellen Carter rise again.