Sorry

Any questions or discussions that you ONLY want to discuss with our staff or volunteers.
(Users: please do not reply to other users here.)
Corrie199689
not a newbie
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:28 pm
Age: 28
Awesomeness Quotient: Dunno
Primary language: English
Pronouns: She
Location: U.K.

Sorry

Unread post by Corrie199689 »

Re: last post

So I now know you can't answer pregnancy scare questions

But can you define the direct contact meaning? sperm on underwear is seen as indirect and not a risk but penis to vagina is direct and is a risk?

Or is any contact with sperm described as direct?
Heather
scarleteen founder & director
Posts: 9703
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2014 11:43 am
Age: 54
Awesomeness Quotient: I have been a sex educator for over 25 years!
Primary language: english
Pronouns: they/them
Sexual identity: queery-queer-queer
Location: Chicago

Re: Sorry

Unread post by Heather »

If you take some time to read some of the content linked in that policy I posted, you'll find the answers to those questions, too.
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead
Corrie199689
not a newbie
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:28 pm
Age: 28
Awesomeness Quotient: Dunno
Primary language: English
Pronouns: She
Location: U.K.

Re: Sorry

Unread post by Corrie199689 »

I reread pregnancy companion and I think I understand now.

So there is only a direct risk if ejaculate comes from the penis to the vagina with no stops in between?

And in the case of my example of ejaculate in the underwear it would just be like the case of dry humping because the sperm would soak into the fabric (if it's like cotton not lace) and therefore can't create a viable pregnancy risk yeah?
Corrie199689
not a newbie
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:28 pm
Age: 28
Awesomeness Quotient: Dunno
Primary language: English
Pronouns: She
Location: U.K.

Re: Sorry

Unread post by Corrie199689 »

???
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic