Direct contact

Any questions or discussions that you ONLY want to discuss with our staff or volunteers.
(Users: please do not reply to other users here.)
Juliaho90
not a newbie
Posts: 147
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:39 am
Age: 34
Pronouns: She
Location: Asia

Direct contact

Unread post by Juliaho90 »

Hi there, I was reading through the pregnancy materials on the page and it says in order for pregnancy to be a possibility, there needs to be direct contact. Here it means direct contact like penis and vagina intercourse and direct ejaculate from penis onto the vagina right?

I’d assume that if there was another stop along the way, it makes it indirect e.g fingers and it makes pregnancy not likely?
Sam W
previous staff/volunteer
Posts: 10320
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:06 am
Age: 33
Awesomeness Quotient: I raise carnivorous plants
Primary language: english
Pronouns: she/her
Sexual identity: queer
Location: Coast

Re: Direct contact

Unread post by Sam W »

Hi Juliaho90,

We use direct to mean that there was no clothing of any kind between genitals. And yes, unless some ejaculated on a hand and then that hand was deliberately and instantly put in contact with a vulva or vagina, there is no risk of pregnancy from ejaculate on hands.
And you to whom adversity has dealt the final blow/with smiling bastards lying to you everywhere you go/turn to and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain/and like the Mary Ellen Carter rise again.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post