Hi there, I was reading through the pregnancy materials on the page and it says in order for pregnancy to be a possibility, there needs to be direct contact. Here it means direct contact like penis and vagina intercourse and direct ejaculate from penis onto the vagina right?
I’d assume that if there was another stop along the way, it makes it indirect e.g fingers and it makes pregnancy not likely?
Direct contact
-
- previous staff/volunteer
- Posts: 10320
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:06 am
- Age: 33
- Awesomeness Quotient: I raise carnivorous plants
- Primary language: english
- Pronouns: she/her
- Sexual identity: queer
- Location: Coast
Re: Direct contact
Hi Juliaho90,
We use direct to mean that there was no clothing of any kind between genitals. And yes, unless some ejaculated on a hand and then that hand was deliberately and instantly put in contact with a vulva or vagina, there is no risk of pregnancy from ejaculate on hands.
We use direct to mean that there was no clothing of any kind between genitals. And yes, unless some ejaculated on a hand and then that hand was deliberately and instantly put in contact with a vulva or vagina, there is no risk of pregnancy from ejaculate on hands.
And you to whom adversity has dealt the final blow/with smiling bastards lying to you everywhere you go/turn to and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain/and like the Mary Ellen Carter rise again.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 3840 Views
-
Last post by KierC
Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:45 pm
-
- 2 Replies
- 11914 Views
-
Last post by Sam W
Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:59 am
-
-
New post Clarification on Potential Risks and Types of Contact
by AlwaysLearning » Sat Apr 27, 2024 5:04 am » in Ask Us! - 11 Replies
- 7610 Views
-
Last post by CaitlinEve
Wed May 01, 2024 6:28 pm
-
-
-
New post Issues with sexual contact: anatomy? arousal?
by WhatMightBe » Mon Apr 29, 2024 1:17 pm » in Ask Us! - 5 Replies
- 3279 Views
-
Last post by Sam W
Tue Apr 30, 2024 6:37 am
-